LTXVII - Science speed
Sun, 11/15/2009 - 05:15 — maho
The science progresses too fast in team games (e.g. LTXV). I suggest slowing science by increasing "sciencebox". The default value is 100%.
- Nx50 (N= average team size) (write-in) (53.8%)
- 600 (write-in), 150
- Nx100 (write-in)
- 200 (write-in)
- N*25 (write-in)
- 400 (write-in), 140, 120, 100, 125 (write-in)
Total voters: 15
Comments
N x 100 where N is average
N x 100 where N is average team size in game
speed
A variable setting is a good idea but I think Nx100 will be too slow (very long game) because we already share tech inside alliances in FFA-diplomacy games. I suggest Nx50.
revision
I had made this vote just for LTXVII so I had constant options but proportional options are better so I tried removing my original constant options and add only N*25, N*50, N*75, N*100 but it gave error probably because the voting had already started.
I'm against such change. I
I'm against such change. I mean - replacing options by totally different options.
More, I think I'm against options which depends on number of players. Let's say - I can live with map size which I must calculate every game, but please treat it rather as exception - not rule.
Some options do depend on number of players
I disagree with Maho.
Some options are best flexible depending on number of players and size of teams. For example number of starting settlers should be reduced when the team size is big.
ok there is no harm in
ok there is no harm in keeping the constant options but I can only add 1 write-in option. I added Nx50. If I could add more than one write-in option, I'd also add N*25, N*75, N*100, 200, and 300. We need an option between 150 and 600.
No reason to add more
No reason to add more write-ins. If you're decided what option you want to be winner, then it's one option only. If you're not decided - then you don't vote until you're decided. In both cases you don't need to add more than one option :).
Maybe, but from
Maybe, but from administrator point of view it's a PITA :).
Invalid argument supplied for foreach() .....
This is a mess!
yep, I suggest to not edit
yep, I suggest to not edit votings after voting started. It's unfair, and it also leads to funny results.
I will try to do something to make it impossible. Before I will find solution, I will change author of each poll to me :).
Please re-post the poll, and don't make idiots from voters.
UPDATE - no need to repost
UPDATE - no need to repost poll
Error messages
For those who missed it this page was covered in strange error messages before Maho restarted the poll.