password sharing - what to do with Kryon and Dev

# (zgrep " lt" /var/log/xxxxxx.gz;grep " lt" /var/log/yyyyyyyy ;grep " lt" /var/log/zzzzzzz) | egrep -i "(kryon|dev): connected"| perl -pe "s/^(\w+\s*\d+\s*\d+:\d+:\d+).*\s(lt[\w\d]+):.*\(\d+\) (\w+): connected \[(.*)\]/\4 | \1 | \3 | \2 /" | sort
c-68-38-24-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net | Dec 28 22:01:29 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-38-24-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net | Dec 29 01:11:18 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-38-24-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net | Dec 29 02:39:22 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-38-24-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net | Dec 29 20:58:46 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-38-24-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net | Dec 29 21:13:21 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Dec 30 13:47:33 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Dec 30 13:48:12 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Dec 31 02:11:27 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Dec 31 02:20:49 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Dec 31 02:39:57 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Dec 31 17:21:48 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Dec 31 17:24:43 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 1 03:38:23 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 1 03:48:06 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 1 04:20:27 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 1 06:14:39 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 1 08:28:41 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 1 16:13:01 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 1 16:18:38 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 1 19:29:53 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 2 04:32:49 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 2 04:37:10 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 2 11:17:00 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 2 11:17:30 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 2 11:28:53 | dev | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 2 11:29:11 | dev | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 2 16:54:51 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 2 16:55:50 | dev | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 3 07:15:37 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 3 07:20:36 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-50-171-21.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 3 07:44:26 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-68-57-156-168.hsd1.va.comcast.net | Dec 27 22:31:22 | dev | ltxvii
c-68-57-156-168.hsd1.va.comcast.net | Dec 30 00:18:31 | dev | ltxvii
c-68-57-156-168.hsd1.va.comcast.net | Jan 1 00:28:12 | dev | ltxvii
c-68-57-156-168.hsd1.va.comcast.net | Jan 2 04:46:55 | dev | ltxvii
c-68-57-156-168.hsd1.va.comcast.net | Jan 3 00:07:03 | dev | ltxvii
c-68-57-156-168.hsd1.va.comcast.net | Jan 4 03:40:09 | dev | ltxvii
c-68-57-156-168.hsd1.va.comcast.net | Jan 4 23:26:06 | dev | ltxvii
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 4 02:36:05 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 4 02:48:10 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 4 03:11:37 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 01:19:07 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 01:20:47 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 02:25:36 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 02:26:19 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 09:52:01 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 09:54:27 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 12:25:54 | Kryon | ltxvi
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 12:56:04 | Kryon | ltxvii
c-98-218-116-105.hsd1.md.comcast.net | Jan 5 16:23:35 | Kryon | ltxvi

It's evident cheating.

What should we do with Kryon and Dev?

Voting time: 5 days

  1. nothing (62.5%)
  2. remove from LT XVI and LTXVII
  3. remove from LTXVII
  4. make a site rule on penalties first
  5. Put Kryon in his own team of 1 (write-in), suspend both from 1 next game or prevent a couple turns from this game :-) (write-in), other, remove Dev from site, remove Kryon from site, remove Dev from LT XVI and LT XVII, remove Kryon from LT XVI and LT XVII, remove from site
Total voters: 16

Comments

terror's picture

Log's comment

Log's shows that Kryon logged as dev 3 times, but one only by mistake to lt16, so total 2.
Not much.

What did Kryon after log?
He checked if unit has moves, but it didn't yet.
Then I posted my log about pass share.
After that Kryon logged another time and then made moves, destroying some city/cities.

Then he wrote message here that he didn't made any moves and logged only once.

I think that remove either

I think that remove either player from site (I guess this means banning from all games) would be very bad.

We have only done that to 1 person (I believe) in the past but he was a continual re-offender (I'm not even sure a permanent ban was appropriate).

Kryon I would be interested in your thoughts if different from "nothing".

Why is this the only poll?

Maho given that Mrsynical has now admitted that his team cheated in LTXVI why is this the only poll?

maho's picture

Could you remind me post

Could you remind me post about it?

I remember that someone was complaining about someone doing' something bad, but stopped when I asked for details. Maybe it was about Mrsynical?

Anyway - for doing something with someone who breaks the rules/is cheating , etc... I must have something more than "XXX is cheating".

Make a site rule on penalties first.

It is not sensible to vote on penalties during a game in progress. The rules and penalties should be known beforehand.

As a strong example of how bad this can be in LTXVI it is Mrsynical's team that cheated. They are ten players. I am in a team of 5. To have a majority vote to punish the cheating side when the cheats outnumber us 2 to 1 is not 'cool'.

maho's picture

It is not sensible to vote

It is not sensible to vote on penalties during a game in progress. The rules and penalties should be known beforehand.

I don't agree ... you cannot describe each type of cheating in rules, because they would be as long as european "constitution".

But such kind of cheating isn't described in rules - that's why I launched poll instead of just remove Kryon and Dev. From next time I won't ask but cut, because new point appeared in http://www.longturn.org/rules.

As a strong example of how bad this can be in LTXVI it is Mrsynical's team that cheated. They are ten players. I am in a team of 5. To have a majority vote to punish the cheating side when the cheats outnumber us 2 to 1 is not 'cool'.

I hear about that cheating from some time, but noone described exactly what that cheating is.

Also, note that such voting isn't limited to given game players only, but to whole LT site, so even Janq or KDE could vote here ....

Whats the problem?


Also, note that such voting isn't limited to given game players only, but to whole LT site, so even Janq or KDE could vote here ....

So I'm not on LongTurn for 2 years and then I heard someone was saying something behind my back, care to explain whats going on here?

maho's picture

Oh man, whole 2 years

Oh man, whole 2 years discussion on LT forum was said behind your back. Hopefully everything is public, so you can just read it ...

Timing is everything.

Just to be clear I voted and wrote the comment about making the rules and penalties known, BEFORE such a rule and penalty existed. My vote no longer makes sense. I will change it later.

vote

First of all, it should be clear that dev has no fault. He had given me his password earlier in the game because he was away for a couple of days and he didn't know then that it was possible to delegate control. So, this vote should certainly not include him.

I think some of us are too tense but if it will help them relax, I'll certainly accept the result of this vote as long as at least half of the players in LT17 (14 players) participate in the vote. If fewer people vote than majority won't have much meaning especially since the game is a team game. So, I suggest ending the vote after at least 14 players in the game participate in the vote, not in 5 days.

I agree with Kevin that a much better way to resolve these issues is to open a vote for violations and punishments that will apply to all FUTURE games so that we don't have to vote for every case. Also, the punishment should not be too harsh the first time, it should increase with repetition.

edrim's picture

So, I suggest ending the

So, I suggest ending the vote after at least 14 players in the game participate in the vote, not in 5 days.

We have had lots of polls here, some of us usually not reading this page regulary and we accept changes even if there is few players voting. So this time should be different.

If you want people to vote this poll send them an e-mail.

Also, the punishment should not be too harsh the first time, it should increase with repetition.

This is not first time when somebody broke sharing password rule. Last time was only talking about it, this time is poll, because if nothing happend everyody starts to shar theirs password in long term and we will back to the past with big mess.

maho's picture

First of all, it should be

First of all, it should be clear that dev has no fault. He had given me his password earlier in the game because he was away for a couple of days and he didn't know then that it was possible to delegate control. So, this vote should certainly not include him.

It isn't so clear for me. Dev gave you his password. It's very clear for me that it's fault. It doesn't matter if he did it in the past or now. It's security breach and he could change password - he didn't.

So he is guilty the same or even more as you.

I think some of us are too tense but if it will help them relax, I'll certainly accept the result of this vote as long as at least half of the players in LT17 (14 players) participate in the vote. If fewer people vote than majority won't have much meaning especially since the game is a team game. So, I suggest ending the vote after at least 14 players in the game participate in the vote, not in 5 days.

:):) . Ok, so if this voting won't have 14 voters, then I won't apply it's result , but I will make independent and authoritarian admin decision, accidentially concident with result of the poll.

Also, the punishment should not be too harsh the first time, it should increase with repetition.

It isn't first time. It happend few times in the past, we were talking how bad is it etc..., and no result. So now is time to increase of punishment ....

tjal's picture

rules

Rule #18 is clear about this, although there is a great chance kryon and/or dev may have not read it. Personally I think the rules section can be more clear, like a part 'Things that get you banned'. (I just found out I'm in violation of rule #17, christmas is long ago)

As for kryon and dev, just reprimand them. It was not severe cheating (was it?), keep them in the games.

maho's picture

to avoid misunderstandings -

to avoid misunderstandings - rule #18 appeared today ...

tjal's picture

rule #18

If it wasn't a rule, what was the cheating? Kryon and dev are in the same team right? It looks like a wrong way of control delegation, but cheating?

terror's picture

Yeah .. you see what your

Yeah .. you see what your ally is doing and in right moment without taking delegation you log as your ally and making move just after 10h. If he give delagation then opposite team would know that something has gonna happend ( especially if that person is Kryon who is well know to always abusing this timeout to attack )

With password you can also vote here.
There is no rule for 2 accounts. So people should not be banned for that. So feel free to create 100 accounts and vote.
There is no rule for hacking server eg. crashing, maphacking or so. So it's allowed too.

So do you think obvious things which arent lsited in rules are allowed.
Will you be happy if I hack your accont and play instead you? It's allowed .. especially when pass sharing is allowed.

Also writing apologies after that incident and lying there is cool. Totally awesome.

tjal's picture

ok

Giving your password for delegation isn't as obvious cheating as the other things you mention, because I don't know the game that well yet.
BTW mentioning some obvious rules does no harm, for example: http://hattrick.org/Help/Rules...

The question remains did kryon and dev willfully cheated(gained an advantage)? If so, it seems obvious to me that sanctions must follow.

maho's picture

yes, cheating. From very

yes, cheating.

From very long time lot of us consider password sharing as cheating - inappropriate advantage ....

Neither vote is appealing to me

Neither vote is appealing to me, perhaps I'll vote later.

The option 'remove Dev from LT XVI and LT XVII' is invalid, since Dev is not participating in XVI. But that only as a side note.

Nobody has earned Longterm fame in this affair to this moment. Passing on passwords and using passed passwords is bad behavior, which should be inhibited somehow.

On the other hand: Crying in game 'Cheater' and doing the utmost to ruin the fun of the remaining players is also bad behavior. If you think, I'm happy that my enemy terror delegated control to my ally bluemoth, please think again. Bluemoth hasn't any more time to play even his own nation, and terror is aware of that.

If the result of the vote is to remove Kryon from LTXVI, I'd be unhappy. It has been an interesting game so far. I noticed nothing unfair at all in that game before yesterday. Kryon is holding an important position. Removing him would mean for me to put an untimely end to LTXVI.

terror's picture

About 50 turns ago you

About 50 turns ago you didn't want to peace. You prefered to join stronger allianze to beat weaker.
I told you at least 30 turns ago that I will loose that game, but you were happy of the situation. Behind triple city walls you haven't noticed that I'm loosing 3 cannons per 1 musket.
I was masochist long time to play that. And you want to beat me another 50 days .. so I will suffer slowly each day. I cannon just quit and bluemoth was online and he told me he will take my civ. Maybe playing 10 vs 5 is interesting for you, maybe Kryon's civilization has importang meaning, but his cicvilization is made only from tents under the skies. His style of play is like to prove that all you need in that game is barracks and units. No othere buildings. Absolutly nothing more. Due to LongTurn settings that awful tactics is very powerful. Yeah - the best civilization - people in tents but can produce artilleries and stealth fighters soon.
Are you wondering why I was attacking all of you last 40 turns? Simple - the best defence is attack ... you dont even know that all my cites were empty almost all time.
I told bluemoth that I wont come back - let he do what he wants with my civilization.
Most interesting things are waiting for you in lt16 ... your tactic will never lead to victory anyway.

JohnJ's picture

I just learned about this

I just learned about this poll, and after reading everything I must admit everything is not clear.

First Kevin argue that our team is cheating since at least 50 turns on LTXVI...I am not aware of that. If by what he wrotes and Terror wrotes, he means having 10 players figthing 5 is cheating, I must say I agree it's not nice (especially when you are inside the team of 5 players being attacked), but if it's a way to prevent them winning the game, it's part of the game. I see no cheating at all in all of this.

As for Kryon, now I see that Dev gave him his password. I agree it's against the rule, but if you read the rules, it's also stated that:"Delegation should be allowed only when really away reason occured, should be removed right after away person is no longer away, and should not be repeated more often than once a week". Well, if we really check that, only on LTXVI for example, you may notice many people broke this rule. And there isn't a lot of difference with someone giving his password to an other player so that he can handle his civ. I made that mistake too during my first game. I had to leave and did not known about the delegation (I agree, I was faulty, the rules can be read), so it happens sometimes.
Maybe Kryon made a mistake by not telling Dev that he should delegate his account, but then why people doing a delegation for less than one day, and many times par week are not also judged here?

I think rules must be cleared. And if a rule is in place, then it must be applied...

Clarification of Delegation Usage

This is a reply to JohnJ comments on LTXVI.

The poll that MrSynical wrote to 'clarify' delegation use is here. http://longturn.org/clarificat...

If you read the first few comments you will realise that I do not agree with the wording or intent of this poll. But I lost the argument. It was voted in as a site rule. Since then I have stuck to this new rule.

On Dec 23rd members of your team broke this rule. The issue I have been striving to point out to everyone is that the people who made the rule do not uphold it. See http://longturn.org/clarificat... for the conclusion of the argument.

Maho argues that fully articulated rules would be like the European Constitution. Maybe so. But badly worded rules just leave a mess of ambiguities and are open to tactical manipulation.

I see nothing wrong in a team of ten fighting against five if that is what they must do in order to prevent the five from winning.

maho's picture

Maho argues that fully

Maho argues that fully articulated rules would be like the European Constitution. Maybe so. But badly worded rules just leave a mess of ambiguities and are open to tactical manipulation.

Every rule is open to tactical situation.

I think that it's simple: if rule is clear enough, or administrator is enough convinced about some interpretation of the rule - then rule is just applied.

If it's not clear - then poll is made to make decision by community.

JohnJ's picture

Kevin, I did not noticed

Kevin,

I did not noticed some in our team brke this rule (I must admit I was not aware of it, but I tend to not delegate my account unless really necessary). If so, I agree it's not fair for you, and for the other players that respect the rules.

As I stated before, if we want to punish ryon for the use of Dev password (with his agreement) then we must also punish those who did not respect the delegation rule...

terror's picture

Do you understand what word

Do you understand what word should and cannot mean????
Rule
5 ) Every player should make their moves every turn.
Should we ban for this, baciuse someone havent made moves???

Delegation 'should' be allowed only when really away reason occured
The same should. Away is not precised also.

rule 18:
Player cannot give his password to anyone else

Do you want to ban det0r and duncan because detor logged for 2 mins?
Or me bacuse I gave delegation for Kryon for 15 mins?
I realised that he will be banned so I wont give it to him ( I promised it earlier to him )

JohnJ's picture

Well, if it was me I would

Well, if it was me I would ban you (or any player that do this kind of action) because you gave your account to Kryon who is your enemy in the game just because you were a bit fed up, those almost stating for 15 min that you dont care anymore of the game, and that there is no need anymore to keep playing (which may meens that you have the right to decide when a game should end just because you lost some cities for some turns?).
;p

maho's picture

I have feeling that it isn't

I have feeling that it isn't related to kryon+dev issue ...

I [cannot] just quit and

Terror:


I [cannot] just quit and bluemoth was online and he told me he will take my civ.
:
:
I told bluemoth that I wont come back - let he do what he wants with my civilization.

There is some misunderstanding here.... Not sure it matters, although maybe it does to your allies.

I wasn't around at the time but I have heard that you chatted with "bluemoth", however, "bluemoth" was actually under the control of duncan.

I believe Bluemoth hasn't logged in since Christmas - you never chatted with him.

I [cannot] just quit and... (continued)

I was puzzled by this comment too.
I thought you had delegated to Bluemoth because he wasn't around.
It means no one is playing your account and your units are idle.

Duncan who is playing for Bluemoth cannot also take your delegation. Only the 'real' Bluemoth can do that.

maho's picture

folks - "make site rule

folks - "make site rule ......" isn't good option to vote for.

It's only because I made mistake while removing that option, and I make it permanent instead of "write in". Please don't vote on it.

janq's picture

Oh. Nice to see terror and

Oh. Nice to see terror and dev playing here. And they rulez... You should more value those players, I suggest.

Btw, why do you consider pass sharing to be a cheating?

terror's picture

Janq - you just hit bottom of T-List

Janq - I want your password for Longturn and warserver. You can't be such egoist and use it alone.
I dont like your vote. I will change it. I would also wrote some extra posts here :)
And on warserver I will make your reputution go down very quick. It will be awesome.

Also if we will ever play here together on LT we won't need to be on turns. Only one of us would be always enough.

janq's picture

Terror, what are u talking

Terror, what are u talking about?

When I played longturn, we had a team of about 6 players and we shared passwords to each-other. I had passwords of jian, natalia, wwqt, zu (some of them still working even for warserver) and we were doing necessary moves when the others were away.

You cannot be here online 24hours/day! Some players are here 5 minutes/day, some 5hours.. It's more profitable if your teammate do an attack or other kind of moves when you are busy. It's the same like both of them are on-line in that time. I don't consider this to be a cheat.

That is pretty much the point janq...

The fact that you can't be online 24 hours/day is the reason for the rule. It provides an advantage for teams which are able to share around members to ensure that someone is on 24h, when not all teams can do this.

Delegation is available if you can't make a move (ie. you are away), but you can't delegate more than once a week to prevent this being abused.

I think the matter has been settled (well at least in this case) - there is no punishment. I think all that is left is for somebody to make a poll/thread to sort out a proper set of rules?

bli's picture

Maybe I'm naive, but I can't

Maybe I'm naive, but I can't imagine how someone can take advantage of logging in as one of his team members.

I already share vision, techs and research with my team. I can see how many units they hide in a city and how much money they own. And AFAIK it's not forbidden to give them even more information via e-mail, to sent or accept advices, suggestions or orders, discuss future plans or to map out a strategy.

What else can I gain when I use the account of a team member?

Anyway I like the idea to punish Kryon and dev. My suggestion is to send some troops and to destroy or conquer some of their cities.

maho's picture

I already share vision,

I already share vision, techs and research with my team. I can see how many units they hide in a city and how much money they own.

But you don't see their orders, their production, their CMAs , their city workers placement, their city food/production/trade surpluses. They must explicite tell you about it.

What else can I gain when I use the account of a team member?

You can do move when your teammate is sleeping. You can coordinate attack in that time, when others must be all awaken on the same time .

and last but not least - you can login into their site account and do something in your teammate behalf - eg. voting.

I think the problem with

I think the problem with password sharing is that it allows somebody to be online 24 hours. It creates an unfair advantage for teams with people all in one time zone (eg europe) against those with mixed time zones that can have somebody online at all hours.

My response

Heres my response, i gave the password to kryon yes, i had no idea it would be a big deal for my own teammate to move for me while i was out of town, however the turn kryon played for me was not the turn he destroyed the city, it was the next.

the next day i was back in town but i had to work, i received kryons email notifying me his city was empty and to take it but like i said i was at work, i received another email 2 hours before i was off of work saying that he destroyed it himself, thinking i was not going to play that turn. So whoever that guy was mr s or something, if you were not going to log in in that 2 to 2.5 hour time span and defend your city it would be the same result, Ilgin just got ahead of himself

and now i understand the delegation rule but this rule itself is almost pointless because it is the same thing, i would have delegated my control to kryon the turn before he destroyed the city not the turn of, so what are the accusations?

maho's picture

and now i understand the

and now i understand the delegation rule but this rule itself is almost pointless because it is the same thing

So if it's the same thing for you, then please use only delegation from now. It shouldn't be problem, because it's the same :).

If you share password again - then you will be removed from game without a warning.

maho's picture

BTW - I have reset passwords

BTW - I have reset passwords for both - you and Kryon. Please use password recovery while login, to set up new.

Please don't share it again.

well i did not know about

well i did not know about delegation at the time and now i do,
thank you

terror's picture

Dont forget that you cant

Dont forget that you cant login to server before you remove delegation and to warserver too.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.